Jamie Kane is the name…

Link: Boing Boing: BBC punks Wikipedia in game marketing ploy? (UPDATED).

This whole affair has been quite funny to watch today, with some mad anti-beeb rants and then the /.ing of wikipedia! Well done Rob C for stepping up the the crease and actually offering an explanation. I for one believe him, having seen the Jamie Kane presentation a few month back all I can say is.. it looks ace. And it’s a real gamble going after a female teen audience rather than the super saturated male young adult market, which is exactly the sort of thing the BBC should be doing. Probably also reduce the risk of a Jamie Kane hot coffee patch too!

The thing is… if we wanted to promote something, especially to that particular demographic, don’t you think it’d be far more effective on the BBC homepage or on CBBC than wikipedia and slashdot? You can count the teenage girls who read slashdot on one hand.

Yup, this must surely rank as the worst planned and executed viral marketing campaign that never was… which is sort of what I’d actually expect from the BBC marketing dept given their past record, a record they seem keen to maintain.

Have you seen the new BBC7 trails… earfood? EARFOOD? What the fuck is that! What was the creative brief? Dolmio meets Tiger Force? Ears, that grow on trees when played digital radio in the Mediterranean, honestly… Why oh why oh why must the BBC marketing messages always always resort to shitty metaphors? If you look at What is BBC7? it says “It’s a mix of the best of BBC comedy, drama, and books as well as a brand new daily live kids’ show..” There you go, practically sells itself! Ask anyone in the street ‘what’s BBC7?’ and I’ll bet they haven’t got a clue, if you’re very lucky you might get someone who says a radio station.. what you won’t get is ‘food for your ears’. Come on guys, sort it out.

Advertisements

3 Responses to “Jamie Kane is the name…”


  1. 1 Toby Bradbury August 16, 2005 at 11:50 am

    Too true about BBC marketing. ‘MI5, not 9 to 5.’ GRRRRRRRR!

  2. 2 Martin August 18, 2005 at 11:52 am

    Notwithstanding the fact that you can’t get BBC7 on portable radio anywhere you would be likely to be able to grow an olive grove…

  3. 3 eyedropper August 19, 2005 at 12:12 pm

    And there’s a great letter in Ariel this week…

    “In relation to the current BBC 7 advertising campagin, can I assume that BBC 7 only provides food for white ears only? How about the odd black ear or brown ear? Or woudl that be too odd? Yet another missed opportunity to increase reach and share by appealing to a wider audience.”

    BF
    BBC People

    WTF?! Increase audience reach by showing disembodied ethnic ears growing on trees listening to digital radio… have I just dropped acid?!


Leave a Reply

Please log in using one of these methods to post your comment:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s




This blog is no longer being updated

I've left it here for historical purposes. Please visit my new blog at www.foodjournalist.co.uk

DISCLAIMER

These are my personal views and not those of Channel 4 or the BBC
August 2005
M T W T F S S
« Jul   Sep »
1234567
891011121314
15161718192021
22232425262728
293031  

%d bloggers like this: