Archive for January 6th, 2005

Springer protests pour in to BBC

BBC NEWS | Entertainment | TV and Radio | Springer protests pour in to BBC. Been a rough ol’ time for Rich ‘n’ Gary,’s feedback and complaints double act. And the points of view message boards are aflame with polarised postings…

In amongst the ‘ABSOLUTE DISGRACE’ brigade there’s some really nice opinions and arguments. At least some people have worked out that it can’t contain 8000 swear words (For a two-hour show, that works out at around one expletive every 0.9 seconds) (except this guy! Ahh bless)

Here’s some other good stats.
a: by it being on at the National Theatre your state taxes have already paid for it, for two years!
b: two tickets to see it at the theatre plus two G&T’s in the interval would set you back a whole year’s licence fee,
and c: Total Licence fee per person per year: £121…Per month: £10.08…Of which goes towards BBC2 programming: £1.51* …BBC2 per day: 4.8pence …Per hour: 0.2pence. So a ball park figure costing is 0.4p for those two hours.

It’s crazy to think that this show’s been on in the West End for two years, and only now is there a fuss by the suburban net curtain twitchers! This has become about religion, at least on the message boards, and the whole thing’s got right out of context. There’s actually a couple of Christians who’ve said that they’ve seen it and it’s not that bad, but yes, it’s adult theme, but ultimately a piece of fiction. What’s really bad is there’s been cases of lobby groups in the America phoning up the switchboard and complaining, and they don’t even pay the licence fee! Gits

Here’s what the show’s creator said about it anyroad.

Because if we’re not carful, we end up with this.

*official BBC predicted spend 2004/05 based on 2003/04 spend.

Two front pages from yesterday’s newspapers


You wold have thought that for once, just once, the Daily Star could have knocked the norks of the front page? The Independent’s done a lot of these sort of framed editorial things recently, on Ken Bigley, Margaret Hassan and other Iraq-tastrophes.

Newsnight asked some interesting questions last night, [watch here] about what could be called ‘grief event horizon’. Guest Frank Furedi made some good points too, that the public gets swept up in these events, Dunblaine, Soham, Diana etc, by the media. He went on ‘..To be a moral responsible individual you have to give more money than someone else… there’s a sense of competitiveness as we face moral confusion… the only time we come together as a people are when we’re facing tragedy, a tragic death or disaster..’ Food for thought indeed. So maybe it’s because so many of us have been to Thailand on holiday, that it’s sort of ‘second world’ and that the disaster was sudden and unstoppable, and that there seems an easy way out, rebuilding and such, rather than having to face a disaster caused by 20 years of civil war and that’ll take 20 years to put right…

The report focused on previous appeals. Stats quoted: emergency appeal for Chechnya raised $40 a head. The floods in Mozambique was only 15% met, raising 40 Cents a head. In contrast the money pledge so far, some 2 billion dollars, means $400 a head for the 5 million people affected in Asia. Another worry now is that the tsunami will take the focus off Africa. On the plus side the other guest said British people give 7.6 billion to charities a year, and that 10% of that goes overseas.

So perhaps this would be a best outcome; If the International Community and people of the World can respond this quickly and with this much will, determination and aid to this disaster, why not keep the momentum going and focus on some of the other problems around the World?

This blog is no longer being updated

I've left it here for historical purposes. Please visit my new blog at


These are my personal views and not those of Channel 4 or the BBC
January 2005
« Dec   Feb »